Black Holes: Part I

I realize it’s been a couple months since my last post on Gravitational Waves, where I said that I would be posting about black holes next. I had a lot happen in the past couple months that I had to deal with before I could start focusing on blogging again. Today, I will give a brief introduction to black holes, and the next post will go into further detail. Stay tuned, and stay patient ūüôā

 

There are only three things you need to know to understand a black hole and that is it’s 1) mass, 2) spin, and 3) electric charge.

By definition a black hole is ¬†an object whose¬†escape speed¬†is the speed of light. Escape speed is the speed it takes for an object to escape gravity (the curvature of spacetime). In order for an object to escape a black hole, it must reach the speed of light. Therefore, light itself cannot escape a black hole. The speed of light can be thought as the “speed limit” of the universe.

It is known that an object that comes into contact with a black hole gets sucked in by it’s gravity and cannot escape. Once the object is sucked in, it is no longer visible and all of it’s information is believed to be lost forever, as if it never existed.

Although a black hole’s gravity is a very strong force, an object that enters into it’s orbit is able to escape as long as it does not cross the¬†event horizon¬†of the black hole. Before reaching the event horizon, gravity is weak. Thus, a slight push would allow for an object to escape the black hole. Once that object reaches the event horizon, it has reached a point of no return. Gravity becomes so strong, that the object would have to have that much stronger of a push in order to get out. Once the object reaches the singularity of the black hole- the small, dense skeleton of the dead star and the source of strong gravity, that is when the object needs a push faster than the speed of light to escape, and that cannot happen. This is why we remain oblivious as to what goes on inside of a black hole, because an object that falls past the event horizon is said to never leave, giving us zero information about what’s inside.

event horizon

Picture from¬†¬†Shane Larson’s blog;¬†who provides a lucid, and entertaining explanation of everything science!

That’s it for now, stay tuned for more ūüôā

This post is part of a series, for links to other posts, click here!

Waves of Spacetime- GW150914

On February 11th, 2016 the world was exposed to a shocking discovery that scientist’s have been questioning since the 1910’s. The idea of Gravitational Waves had been tossed around but never confirmed. This was mostly due to the fact that the detection of a GW seemed impossible because the technology simply did not exist. However, nothing is impossible in the scientific community. The first encounter with GW was with the Hulse-Taylor Pulsar, in which they observed the pulsar’s orbital decay which matched Einstein’s predictions of energy loss by gravitational radiation. This discovery would win them the Nobel Prize in 1993.

Not too many people are familiar with gravitational waves, so I will take this opportunity to clear things up. By the way, the name of the GW detected in the title of this post is the date that it was found! Fun fact for the day.

What is a GW? A gravitational wave is formed by a mass in motion. Think of a stone tossed into a lake. The stone creates ripples, or waves that propagate throughout the lake. The¬†same idea can be applied in space. However,¬†stones in a waternot all masses in space are strong enough to¬†send ripples through spacetime. Only the large, energetic ones like a rotating binary system, supernova’s, black holes, etc. These massive objects are so strong that the space around them will “ripple” as they spin or explode while they are losing energy in the form of gravitational waves. This is why the detection of GW is huge. Only massive violent events in space cause them, therefore, we can study¬†GW to learn more about the events that produced them, like mysterious black holes and possibly the big bang itself.

How do we detect gravitational waves? As previously stated, GW are nearly impossible to detect. As they pass through, they cause distances to change and periodic deformations. Their effect, however, is so small which makes it difficult to detect them. This is because gravity is a weak force and the period of the wave is extremely small. For example, a mass with a diameter of 1 meter would only be deformed by 10^-21 meters. This is why it is very difficult to detect GW. Nevertheless, physicist Albert Michelson came along to show us how we could measure such a small motion. Using the wavelength of light as a measuring device we are able to detect precise movements for exquisitely small distances, or periods.

How is light used as a measuring device?¬†If you’ve ever taken a physics class then you’veinter probably learned about Young’s two slit experiment that allowed us to “see” the wavelengths of light. A single light beam that is shined through two slits can be seen on a blank¬†screen some distance away as a pattern of light and dark “fringes.” This is known as interference. The distance between fringes is directly related to wavelength.

 

Laser Interferometer’s
obs
LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) is a collaboration between multiple physics institutes and research groups dedicated to the search for GW’s, which began in August 2002. Because the wavelength of a GW is directly related to the size of the cosmic event, detectors must be about the size of the cosmic event. Thus, we have two types of man-made devices: Ground Interferometer’s, designed for small cosmic sites w/ GW of a few thousand kilometers, and Space Interferometer’s, designed for large cosmic sites with wavelengths tens of millions of kilometers. The ground interferometers are located in Hanford, Washington and Livingston, Louisana.

Basically, an interferometer sends out a laser beam that hits a beam splitter, splits the light in two where the light is directed toward mirrors that finally send the light back to the beam splitter to form an interference pattern. The arms of the interferometer are the trajectory of the beams, so the pattern depends on the distance between the arms.

laser

If a GW goes through, the distance between the arms changes, leaving the interference pattern changing periodically!
In theory, LIGO could also detect hypothetical phenomena of GW caused by oscillating cosmic strings, and domain walls

LISAPathFinder
Lisa is the first space interferometer that was successfully launched on December 3, 2015. The mission is to map out the technical difficulties that may be experienced by eLisa, which will be launched with three satellites positioned 5 million km away from each other with laser beams connecting the three satellites. Any change in the distance of laser light will suggest a GW passing through.

To watch and learn more about this fascinating historic event, see the video below!

 

Are we really able to learn about the creation of the universe by studying a GW?
Because gravity is such a weak force, gravitational waves interact weakly with their environment. In fact, the effect is so small that they don’t change much because of their weak interactions. This makes them the perfect little “messengers” of distant cosmic events, providing us more information on gravity and how the universe works as gravity is turned into waves.

Side note- an interesting comment was made in the discussion post on GW so I thought I would share:
“gravitational waves, to me, would better explain some kind of d√©j√† v√Ļ, because space time is being curved, it would be a variation on the time that maybe allows someone to look into the past or future for a few milliseconds (or the time it takes to the wave to¬†pass)” -M.A
Something to think about!

That about sums up the discussion on gravitational waves, next time I will talk about black holes- their mysterious nature, escaping them and how GW will provide us with information we would never be able to gather otherwise!

This post is part of a series, for links to other posts, click here!

Can we learn to love again? When the sun and moon collide

 

When it comes to love, none of us know what we are doing. That is a fact. I don’t claim to be an expert either, but we all have our philosophies we like to live by. Everywhere we look we are surrounded by messages of love- some not as apparent as others, but the message is still there. So why is it so hard to love? Shouldn’t that be the one thing in life that comes naturally? The one thing in life that’s¬†easy?

I think we’ve all learned one way or another- most likely the hard way, that love is something that holds tremendous power over us all. We all know that losing someone dear to our hearts is¬†one of the toughest pain to endure- whether it is a break-up, or the death of a close friend or family member. Yet we still can’t quite get it right when we are lucky enough to be given “second chances.” Most of us love ourselves unconditionally, so why is it so hard to extend that love to another human being? We are able to easily speak the words “I love you,” but I don’t think any of us really have a clue as to what we are actually saying.

Continue reading “Can we learn to love again? When the sun and moon collide”

Nature vs. The city – Which do you prefer?

I took a mini vacation for a few days and returned to my homeland of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. I stayed with a friend in her apartment¬†right next to a bar and a hospital. I had mentioned the road trip I am planning for the summer. When she asked where I wanted to go, and I replied “Well, my goal is to get to Montana.” Her and her boyfriend just stared in silence for a few seconds, then laughed and asked “WHY?!” I went on to explain that I don’t care for big cities, and I would prefer to see the beauty of nature around the U.S., they continued to laugh. I mentioned the mountains in Montana and how awesome it would be to see them. She went on to say- (Sarcastically) “Oh, you’re gonna go play in the mountains?” While looking at me like I was crazy.

SO, let me make it clear why I prefer to see the simplicity¬†of nature rather than the ostentatious city with this list of ’20 reasons’ I prepared!

naturevscity

…………………..

1) I’m more interested in natural beauty than artificial beauty.

cool

2)¬†After spending time in nature,¬†you will likely feel a¬†connection and a sense of ‘purpose.’ Ultimately leading to a happier/more satisfying lifestyle.

redwoods

Continue reading “Nature vs. The city – Which do you prefer?”

You’re stranded on an island, what 3 items do you bring? Perhaps a reality check?

I always wonder what it would be like to be stranded on an island. Not that I ever want that to happen, but.. I think it would be pretty neat to just rough it for a certain amt. of time and test out my survival skills. Maybe it’s because two years ago my favorite show on Netflix was “LOST.” My favorite show when I was younger was Survivor.. One of my favorite movies is¬†“Into the Wild,” I like watching animal planet, discovery, and the history channel (when I’m at a house with cable).. and I love to learn simple survival tips.

Continue reading “You’re stranded on an island, what 3 items do you bring? Perhaps a reality check?”

Express Yourself

water

 As I sat on the snowy root of the tree, grounded

I observed the stillness and the silence.

As the colorful wind passed through

The breeze gave life to the nature around me.

The water played a tune as I took a deep breath in, and let it out

Continue reading “Express Yourself”

What’s your motto?

(This is totally my motto.. in addition to, simply: “Do what makes you happy, for you’ll be criticized anyway”)

life
(Although I don’t know whether this is totally glum, or optimistic?!)

..And right before I saw this I was just pondering.. because I saw an angry facebook status about how much everyone sucks and how the world should just end. Here’s my thought: I agree the majority of mankind is hopeless. That being said; that’s why you¬† Continue reading “What’s your motto?”